I would like to work WFP. WFP is 国連世界食糧計画 in Japanese. This work can contribute to the development of the developing country. It helps people troubled with a disaster. I think it is not a simple thing to save people of the poverty. But I think the work to help a person is very nice.
*ccc class*
Dating and personal spaces was interesting for me!!
2008年8月1日金曜日
Personal Spaces
1. You're talking to a co-worker . How close do you stand?
I will stand 1 m apart from co-worker.
2. You're talking to a friend. Do you touch each other?
I usually don't touch each other when I'm talking to friends.
But I touch to them by time and a case.
3. Look at the diagram of a waiting room. Where do you sit when you enter?
I will sit near entrance. Because I want to sit empty seat of either side.
4. You're in a crowded elevator. Where do you look?
I will look the indication number of the floor in the top.
5. You're standing in line. How close do you stand to the person in front?
I will stand 1m.
6. You get on the bus. There is an empty row of seats at the back, and an empty seat close by. Where do you sit?
I will sit an empty seat close by. Because I think I don't have to sit seats at the back.
7. You're in library and there's an empty seat beside you. Do you want to stop someone sitting there ? If so, how?
I can't understand this question...
8. You're going to the beach. Do you like to see lots of people or very few?
I don't like to see lots of people on the beach.
9. When you're talking to someone, do you look them in the eye?
Of cause! I look them in the eye.
10.You're on a train. Do you talk to the other passenger?
No, I don't talk to the other paseenger.
I will stand 1 m apart from co-worker.
2. You're talking to a friend. Do you touch each other?
I usually don't touch each other when I'm talking to friends.
But I touch to them by time and a case.
3. Look at the diagram of a waiting room. Where do you sit when you enter?
I will sit near entrance. Because I want to sit empty seat of either side.
4. You're in a crowded elevator. Where do you look?
I will look the indication number of the floor in the top.
5. You're standing in line. How close do you stand to the person in front?
I will stand 1m.
6. You get on the bus. There is an empty row of seats at the back, and an empty seat close by. Where do you sit?
I will sit an empty seat close by. Because I think I don't have to sit seats at the back.
7. You're in library and there's an empty seat beside you. Do you want to stop someone sitting there ? If so, how?
I can't understand this question...
8. You're going to the beach. Do you like to see lots of people or very few?
I don't like to see lots of people on the beach.
9. When you're talking to someone, do you look them in the eye?
Of cause! I look them in the eye.
10.You're on a train. Do you talk to the other passenger?
No, I don't talk to the other paseenger.
Work Place Questionairre
My score is 28 on a scale of 0 to 100 = Preference for Tolerance for Ambiguity
My score indicates that you have a moderate Tolerance for Ambiguity and might be willing to give up job security for more opportunity. In countries/cultures with a Tolerance for Ambiguity, conflict in organizations is perceived as natural, and rules may be broken for pragmatic reasons. If you work in countries/cultures with a Need for Certainty, such as Japan, France, and Greece, you might react by creating a micro-environment that would shield you from the burden of what you might perceive as excessive structures, rules, and regulations. In countries with a high Need for Certainty, loyalty to an employer is seen as an advantage; a specialist career is preferred over a career in management.
The countries you requested are listed below. The numbers in parentheses refer to the country scores as listed by Professor Geert Hofstede in his book Culture's Consequences:
China (78) Need for Certainty, a preference for an environment that is more structure-oriented, and where rules, roles and management practices are clear and unambiguous
USA (46) Tolerance for Ambiguity, a moderate preference for an entrepreneurial environment which is less bound by rules and regulations
My score indicates that you have a moderate Tolerance for Ambiguity and might be willing to give up job security for more opportunity. In countries/cultures with a Tolerance for Ambiguity, conflict in organizations is perceived as natural, and rules may be broken for pragmatic reasons. If you work in countries/cultures with a Need for Certainty, such as Japan, France, and Greece, you might react by creating a micro-environment that would shield you from the burden of what you might perceive as excessive structures, rules, and regulations. In countries with a high Need for Certainty, loyalty to an employer is seen as an advantage; a specialist career is preferred over a career in management.
The countries you requested are listed below. The numbers in parentheses refer to the country scores as listed by Professor Geert Hofstede in his book Culture's Consequences:
China (78) Need for Certainty, a preference for an environment that is more structure-oriented, and where rules, roles and management practices are clear and unambiguous
USA (46) Tolerance for Ambiguity, a moderate preference for an entrepreneurial environment which is less bound by rules and regulations
登録:
投稿 (Atom)